ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Feature Comparison and Process Optimization of Multiple Dry Etching Techniques Applied in Inner Spacer Cavity Formation of GAA NSFET.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Device Structure and Manufacturing Thermal Budget on Channel Release Module in GAA NSFET and Process Optimization.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inner spacer module, which profoundly affects the final performance of a device, is a critical component in GAA NSFET (Gate-all-around Nanosheet Field Effect Transistor) manufacturing and necessitates systematic optimization and fundamental innovation. This work aims to develop an advanced SiGe etching process with high selectivity, uniformity and low damage to achieve an ideal inner spacer structure for logic GAA NSFETs. For three distinct dry etching technologies, ICP (Inductively Coupled Plasma Technology), RPS (Remote Plasma Source) and Gas Etching, we evaluated their potential and comparative advantages for inner spacer cavity etching under the same experimental conditions. The experimental results demonstrated that Gas Etching technology possesses the uniquely high selectivity of the SiGe sacrificial layer, making it the most suitable approach for inner spacer cavity etching to reduce Si nanosheet damage. Based on the results, in the stacked structures, the SiGe/Si selectivity ratio exhibited in Gas Etching is ~9 times higher than ICP and ~2 times higher than RPS. Through systematic optimization of pre-clean conditions, temperature and chamber pressure control, we successfully achieved a remarkable performance target of cavity etching: the average SiGe/Si etching selectivity is ~56, the inner spacer shape index is 0.92 and the local etching distance variation is only 0.65 nm across different layers. These findings provide valuable guidance for equipment selection in highly selective SiGe etching and offer critical insights into key process module development for GAA NSFETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.