ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Geometry-Dependent Photonic Nanojet Formation and Arrays Coupling.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work systematically investigates photonic nanojet (PNJ) planar arrays formed by periodic arrangements of dielectric microstructures with four geometric configurations: cylinders, cones, truncated pyramids, and pyramids, focusing on the effects of geometry, array arrangement, and array sparsity on PNJ formation and coupling behavior. Full-wave finite-difference time-domain simulations were performed to analyze optical field distributions under different array conditions. The results indicate that under approximately infinite array conditions, different geometries exhibit markedly different coupling responses. Cylindrical and truncated pyramid structures are more susceptible to inter-element scattering, leading to pronounced multistage focusing, whereas pyramid and cone structures maintain higher spatial stability due to dominant localized tip-focusing mechanisms. For the central elements, the maximum PNJ intensity is about 16.4 a.u. for cylindrical structures and 33.5 a.u. for truncated pyramid structures, while significantly higher intensities of approximately 47.5 a.u. and 93 a.u. are achieved for pyramid and cone structures, respectively. In contrast, the FWHM remains nearly constant for all geometries under different array conditions, indicating that lateral focusing is primarily governed by geometry rather than array arrangement. By tuning the array spacing, the inter-element coupling strength can be continuously weakened, and different geometries require distinct sparsity levels to reach the weak-coupling limit. These results establish the dominant role of geometric configuration in PNJ planar arrays and provide guidance for their predictable design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.