ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Reliability of the Output Sports Inertial Measurement Unit in Measuring a Reactive Strength Index from the Drop Jump and 10-5 Rebound Jump Test.
Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the trial-to-trial reliability and usefulness of the Output Sports inertial measurement unit (IMU) in measuring reactive strength index (RSI) derived from the Drop Jump (DJ) and 10-5 rebound jump test (10-5 RJT). Twenty-three male elite intercounty hurlers (mean ± SD; age: 24.3 ± 3.7 years, mass: 88.0 ± 6.3 kg, height: 183.8 ± 5.8 cm, experience at elite level: 5.8 ± 3.8 years) performed three trials each of the DJ and 10-5 RJT, on familiarisation and testing days. There was one week between familiarisation and testing. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) analyses. Usefulness was assessed by comparing typical error (TE) with the smallest worthwhile change (SWC). Both the DJ and 10-5 RJT were reliable in determining RSI, with CV ≤ 10% and ICC ≥ 0.8. The TE was 0.09 and 0.08 for the DJ and 10-5 RJT, respectively. Both tests were unable to detect the SWC, rating them as 'marginal'; however, they were rated as 'good' in detecting moderate change in RSI. The Output Sports IMU is reliable in determining RSI for the DJ and 10-5 RJT; however, it is unable to detect the SWC. Future research must determine validity of the Output Sports IMU in measuring RSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.