ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Empirical Evaluation of UNet for Segmentation of Applicable Surfaces for Seismic Sensor Installation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The deployment of wireless seismic nodal systems necessitates the efficient identification of optimal locations for sensor installation, considering factors such as ground stability and the absence of interference. Semantic segmentation of satellite imagery has advanced significantly, and its application to this specific task remains unexplored. This work presents a baseline empirical evaluation of the U-Net architecture for the semantic segmentation of surfaces applicable for seismic sensor installation. We utilize a novel dataset of Sentinel-2 multispectral images, specifically labeled for this purpose. The study investigates the impact of pretrained encoders (EfficientNetB2, Cross-Stage Partial Darknet53-CSPDarknet53, and Multi-Axis Vision Transformer-MAxViT), different combinations of Sentinel-2 spectral bands (Red, Green, Blue (RGB), RGB+Near Infrared (NIR), 10-bands with 10 and 20 m/pix spatial resolution, full 13-band), and a technique for improving small object segmentation by modifying the input convolutional layer stride. Experimental results demonstrate that the CSPDarknet53 encoder generally outperforms the others (IoU = 0.534, Precision = 0.716, Recall = 0.635). The combination of RGB and Near-Infrared bands (10 m/pixel resolution) yielded the most robust performance across most configurations. Reducing the input stride from 2 to 1 proved beneficial for segmenting small linear objects like roads. The findings establish a baseline for this novel task and provide practical insights for optimizing deep learning models in the context of automated seismic nodal network installation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.