Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590907›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Comparative Evaluation of Vision-Language Models for Detecting and Localizing Dental Lesions from Intraoral Images.

Maria Jahan, Al Ibne Siam, Lamim Zakir Pronay, Saif Ahmed, Nabeel Mohammed, James Dudley, Taseef Hasan Farook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria JahanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Science, North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
Al Ibne SiamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Science, North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
Lamim Zakir PronayDepartment of CSE, National Institute of Technology Andhra Pradesh, Tadepalligudem 534101, India.
Saif AhmedDepartment of Electrical and Computer Science, North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5782-9894
Nabeel MohammedDepartment of Electrical and Computer Science, North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-7661-3570
James DudleyAdelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-0531
Taseef Hasan FarookAdelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5905-1572

Funding

The University of Adelaide 350-75134777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the efficiency of vision-language models in detecting and classifying carious and non-carious lesions from intraoral photo imaging. A dataset of 172 annotated images were classified for microcavitation, cavitated lesions, staining, calculus, and non-carious lesions. Florence-2, PaLI-Gemma, and YOLOv8 models were trained on the dataset and model performance. The dataset was divided into 80:10:10 split, and the model performance was evaluated using mean average precision (mAP), mAP50-95, class-specific precision and recall. YOLOv8 outperformed the vision-language models, achieving a mean average precision (mAP) of 37% with a precision of 42.3% (with 100% for cavitation detection) and 31.3% recall. PaLI-Gemma produced a recall of 13% and 21%. Florence-2 yielded a mean average precision of 10% with a precision and recall was 51% and 35%. YOLOv8 achieved the strongest overall performance. Florence-2 and PaLI-Gemma models underperformed relative to YOLOv8 despite the potential for multimodal contextual understanding, highlighting the need for larger, more diverse datasets and hybrid architectures to achieve improved performance.

Indexed as

calculusdeep learningstainingvision–language modelsYOLO

Identifiers

PMID41590907
PMCPMC12842643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.