ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Object Detection on Road: Vehicle's Detection Based on Re-Training Models on NVIDIA-Jetson Platform.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EdgeLane-SEG: an energy-efficient embedded edge AI framework for real-time road marking and lane lines detection with instance segmentation in ADAS and autonomous driving.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) techniques has driven advances in vehicle classification and detection applications for embedded devices with deployment constraints due to computational cost and response time. In the case of urban environments with high traffic congestion, such as the city of Lima, it is important to determine the trade-off between model accuracy, type of embedded system, and the dataset used. This study was developed using a methodology adapted from the CRISP-DM approach, which included the acquisition of traffic videos in the city of Lima, their segmentation, and manual labeling. Subsequently, three SSD-based detection models (MobileNetV1-SSD, MobileNetV2-SSD-Lite, and VGG16-SSD) were trained on the NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB platform. The results show that the VGG16-SSD model achieved the highest average precision (mAP ≈90.7%), with a longer training time, while the MobileNetV1-SSD (512×512) model achieved comparable performance (mAP ≈90.4%) with a shorter time. Additionally, data augmentation through contrast adjustment improved the detection of minority classes such as Tuk-tuk and Motorcycle. The results indicate that, among the evaluated models, MobileNetV1-SSD (512×512) achieved the best balance between accuracy and computational load for its implementation in ADAS embedded systems in congested urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.