Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590902›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2025

Advancing Medical Decision-Making with AI: A Comprehensive Exploration of the Evolution from Convolutional Neural Networks to Capsule Networks.

Ichrak Khoulqi, Zakariae El Ouazzani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ichrak KhoulqiDICC Team, Data4Earth Laboratory, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0001-7657-1780
Zakariae El OuazzaniLaboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Data Sciences and Emerging Systems, School of Applied Sciences, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fes 30000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-4775-5967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a literature review regarding two deep learning architectures, namely Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Capsule Networks (CapsNets), applied to medical images, in order to analyze them to help in medical decision support. CNNs demonstrate their capacity in the medical diagnostic field; however, their reliability decreases when there is slight spatial variability, which can affect diagnosis, especially since the anatomical structure of the human body can differ from one patient to another. In contrast, CapsNets encode not only feature activation but also spatial relationships, hence improving the reliability and stability of model generalization. This paper proposes a structured comparison by reviewing studies published from 2018 to 2025 across major databases, including IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and MDPI. The applications in the reviewed papers are based on the benchmark datasets BraTS, INbreast, ISIC, and COVIDx. This paper review compares the core architectural principles, performance, and interpretability of both architectures. To conclude the paper, we underline the complementary roles of these two architectures in medical decision-making and propose future directions toward hybrid, explainable, and computationally efficient deep learning systems for real clinical environments, thereby increasing survival rates by helping prevent diseases at an early stage.

Indexed as

CapsNetsclassificationCNNsmedical decision-makingsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41590902
PMCPMC12842556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.