ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Excellent Reproducibility of Synthetic Extracellular Volume Without Blood Extraction Across Different Cardiomyopathies Using Published Regression Models.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) calculations in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have the potential to identify early fibrosis that is not yet visible using late gadolinium enhancement; however, the need for same-day blood draws due to the temporal variations in hematocrit (Hct) limits the use of ECV. We aimed to determine the reproducibility of synthetic Hct and ECV using different published models among groups of subjects. Healthy subjects and those with diagnosed cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) scanned using a 1.5T scanner with native and post-contrast T1 maps and same-day Hct were included. Among 148 subjects, there was excellent reproducibility (all ICCs ~0.98) between synthetic and measured ECV across the six formulas, despite only modest reproducibility of synthetic/measured Hct (ICCs 0.52-0.66). The levels of accuracy predicting abnormal measured ECV were consistently excellent among the different synthetic ECV models. The difference in the CMR vendor used to generate models did not seem to affect the results of the comparisons. We conclude that synthetic ECV yielded excellent reproducibility compared with ECV calculated using measured hematocrit, possibly obviating the need for blood extraction in cardiac MRI settings without point-of-care Hct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.