ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and risk of benign breast disease: The National Cancer Institute Diethylstilbestrol Follow-up Study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES), a prototypical endocrine disruptor, has been associated with increased breast cancer risk after age 40. We assessed the association between prenatal DES exposure and self-reported benign breast disease (BBD)-an established breast cancer risk factor-among 4208 DES-exposed and 1830 unexposed women in the National Cancer Institute DES Follow-up Study. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Follow-up started at birth and ended at the earliest of: BBD, breast cancer diagnosis, death, or loss to follow-up. We estimated cumulative incidence of BBD by DES exposure. Over the course of the study, 6038 women contributed 333,458 person-years with median follow-up of 43.0 (range: 13.8-74.0) years for 1089 BBD cases and 60.0 (range: 19.7-80.3) years for 4949 non-cases. Comparing BBD rates among DES-exposed with unexposed women, the HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.11), with no evidence of a dose-response relationship or difference in cumulative incidence by exposure. In conclusion, the HR for BBD was not elevated among women who were prenatally exposed to DES, suggesting that observed increases in breast cancer risk associated with DES are not due to this pathological mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.