ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Fibrous Biomaterial Scaffold for Tympanic Membrane Repair: Microarchitectural Engineering and Structure Function Performance.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of endoscopic removal of anterior malleolar ligament calcification combined with tympanic membrane repair for the treatment of conductive hearing loss.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Bioprinting in Tissue Repair and Its ENT Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tympanic membrane (TM) perforations, arising from infections, injuries, or chronic otitis media, remain a frequent clinical finding and can lead to hearing problems when the tissue does not regenerate adequately. Although autologous grafts are still the standard option for repairing persistent defects, they come with well-known limitations. Beyond the need for additional harvesting procedures, these grafts rarely reproduce the intricate, fibrous layering of the native TM, which can compromise sound transmission after healing. In search of alternatives, fibre-based scaffolds have attracted considerable interest. The primary advantage of this material is the level of structural control it affords. The fibre orientation, porosity, and overall microarchitecture can be adjusted to replicate the organisation and mechanical behaviour of the natural membrane. A range of biocompatible polymers-among them silk fibroin, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(lactic acid), and poly(vinyl alcohol) and their composites-provide options for tuning stiffness, degradation rates, and interactions with cells, making them suitable building blocks for TM repair constructs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary fabrication methodologies, namely electrospinning, additive manufacturing, melt electrowriting, and hybrid strategies. In addition, it offers a detailed discussion of the evaluation procedures employed for these scaffolds and discusses how scaffold structure affects later performance. Mechanical testing, microstructural imaging, and in vitro biocompatibility assays help to determine how closely a construct can approach the performance of the native tissue. Bringing these elements together may support the gradual translation of fibre-based TM scaffolds into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.