ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Biomechanical Effects of Platform Diameter and Screw Length in an Abutment-Free Tissue-Level Implant System Compared with a Ti-Base Configuration: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Titanium Base-Free Multi-Unit Abutment Connections: A Critical Review of Prosthetic Screw Design, Biomechanical Behavior, and Clinical Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This finite element analysis compared a tissue-level implant with an engaging Ti-base to abutment-free, direct-to-implant, tissue-level configurations (3.7 mm and 4.5 mm platforms; short and long retention screws) to examine how platform width and screw length influence stresses under axial and oblique loads. Five configurations were modeled with identical materials and boundary conditions. Screw preload corresponding to a tightening torque of 35 N·cm was applied in the first step, followed by either a 400 N axial load or a 300 N at 30°. Oblique loading dominated the mechanical response, increasing stresses relative to axial loading and concentrating them at the implant neck and first thread, as well as at the crown screw-access and antirotation regions. Under oblique loads, the 3.7 mm platform implant showed the highest stresses, whereas the 4.5 mm platform implant was comparable to or slightly less stressed than the Ti-base configuration, whose peaks remained confined to a small internal recess. Crown stresses remained localized around the antirotation features, while the composite layer bore negligible load. Within the limitations of this numerical model, abutment-free, direct-to-implant workflows may achieve biomechanical performance comparable to Ti-base solutions if platform and screw selection are aligned with the occlusal scheme, but ISO-style fatigue testing and experimental or clinical validation are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.