Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590767›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026

Exploring the Impact of Open Pedagogy on Minority Students' Motivation, Computational Thinking, and Perceived Learning in Interactive Computer Game Development.

Yu-Tung Kuo, Yu-Chun Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu-Tung KuoDepartment of Applied Engineering Technology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA.
Yu-Chun KuoDepartment of Critical Literacy, Technology & Multilingual Education, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7147-9798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of open educational resources (OERs) is on the rise in higher education. Open pedagogy, as a learner-centered approach, provides students with opportunities to create, design, or adapt openly licensed materials or resources. With the potential of open pedagogy to enhance student learning, this study investigated the effect of an open pedagogy project on minority students' motivation and perceived learning in the computer game programming course. An experimental design was implemented to compare minority students' learning in programming through the open pedagogy approach versus the traditional approach. Participants were fifty-eight minority students enrolled in game courses from an institution in the southeastern United States. Thirty students received the instruction with open pedagogy, while twenty-eight students were in the traditional instruction. Quantitative approaches were performed to analyze the collected data. The results indicated that minority students in the open pedagogy group perceived significantly higher levels of motivation on the aspect of pressure/tension than those receiving the traditional approach. Minority students participating in the open pedagogy project had significantly higher levels of computational thinking and perceived learning performance in computer programming, compared to the students with the traditional instruction. Major findings and limitations of this study (i.e., short intervention period, small sample size, etc.) were reported and discussed.

Indexed as

computational thinkingcomputer game developmentcomputer programmingmotivationopen educational resources (OER)open pedagogy

Identifiers

PMID41590767
PMCPMC12842658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.