ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Beyond Mean Scores: Sex Differences in Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem-Solving as Intraindividual Strengths Across Age Groups.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The underrepresentation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields has been a longstanding issue. Traditionally, research on sex differences in cognitive abilities has focused on mean scores, which are often trivial and do not appear to explain sex disparities in STEM participation. Recently, intraindividual strengths have been proposed as a more relevant factor; they reflect an individual's relative advantage in one skill (e.g., literacy) compared with a set of related skills (literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving). Previous studies have primarily examined younger cohorts, and intraindividual strengths remain unexplored across the lifespan. In this study, we employed data from the second cycle of the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) including 157,525 individuals from 30 countries to assess sex differences in literacy, numeracy, and problem-solving as intraindividual strengths across five age groups (16-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, and 55+ years). Consistent with previous research, women outperformed men in literacy, while men outperformed women in numeracy. These patterns were observed universally across countries and age groups. In contrast, no sex differences were observed in problem-solving. Future research should move beyond mean scores to focus on intraindividual strengths, as they may be more relevant for understanding sex disparities in STEM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.