ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
The Concurrent and Longitudinal Contributions of Linguistic and Cognitive Skills to L2 Writing Quality.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modality Matters: How Combining Handwriting and Typewriting Practice Improves Chinese Skills Performance for Chinese L2 Learning in China.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on second language (L2) writing has primarily focused on linguistic skills, with limited attention to higher-order cognitive skills such as inference making. This study expands prior research by examining both concurrent and longitudinal effects of linguistic skills (vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, and morphological awareness) and inference making on L2 English writing quality among 135 Chinese high school English learners. Students' linguistic skills, inference making, and writing were assessed in Grade 10 and Grade 11. Regression analyses showed that, in Grade 10, vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, and inference making significantly predicted writing quality, whereas in Grade 11, morphological awareness, grammatical knowledge, and inference making were significant predictors. Longitudinally, Grade 10 morphological awareness uniquely contributed to L2 writing quality in Grade 11 after controlling for the autoregressive effect of L2 writing quality in Grade 10. These findings highlight the key role of inference making in writing development and reveal that linguistic skills contribute to writing differently across grades. Pedagogically, the results underscore the importance of targeting grade-specific skills to support higher-quality English writing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.