Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590541›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026

Post-NAC Microcalcifications in Breast Cancer: Rethinking Surgical Indications in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Sabatino D'Archi, Beatrice Carnassale, Lorenzo Scardina, Cristina Accetta, Flavia De Lauretis, Alba Di Leone, Antonio Franco, Federica Gagliardi, Stefano Magno, Francesca Moschella and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sabatino D'ArchiBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0223-9635
Beatrice CarnassaleBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1416-9240
Lorenzo ScardinaBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-2851
Cristina AccettaBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3275-4670
Flavia De LauretisBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-5324
Alba Di LeoneBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8219-5336
Antonio FrancoBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6773-3848
Federica GagliardiBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Stefano MagnoBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-9693
Francesca MoschellaBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Maria NataleBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-8941
Alejandro Martin SanchezBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4840-507X
Marta SilenziBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Pierluigi Maria RinaldiUnit of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy.
Gianluca FranceschiniBreast Surgery Unit, Department of Woman and Child's Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-3395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual microcalcifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer remain a complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Although NAC has significantly improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and transformed surgical approaches, the persistence or evolution of microcalcifications may not accurately reflect residual disease. This discrepancy complicates radiologic interpretation, impacts surgical decision-making, and may lead to overtreatment or unnecessary mastectomies. This review synthesizes current evidence on the radiologic-pathologic correlation of post-NAC microcalcifications, their prognostic value, and their relevance to guiding surgical management in contemporary precision oncology. A narrative review of the literature was performed, focusing on imaging evolution after NAC, pathologic correlations, predictive and prognostic implications, and the role of microcalcifications in defining optimal surgical strategies, ranging from breast-conserving surgery to mastectomy. Emerging contributions from digital breast tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), Magnetic Resonance (MR) and radiomics are also examined. Studies consistently demonstrate that residual microcalcifications are often poor predictors of viable tumor tissue after NAC. Up to half of cases with persistent calcifications may reflect minimal or absent residual invasive cancer, whereas calcifications may also persist in areas of treatment-induced necrosis or fibrosis. Reliance on calcifications alone may therefore lead to unnecessary extensive resections. Conversely, specific morphologic patterns, especially fine pleomorphic or branching calcifications, are more strongly associated with residual malignancy. Advanced imaging and radiomics show promise in improving predictive accuracy. Residual microcalcifications after NAC should not be interpreted as a direct surrogate of residual disease. A multimodal assessment integrating imaging evolution, tumor biology, and treatment response is essential to optimize surgical planning and avoid overtreatment. Precision surgery in the NAC era increasingly requires individualized decision-making supported by advanced imaging and robust radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast-conserving surgerycontrast-enhanced mammographymicrocalcificationsMRIneoadjuvant chemotherapyprecision surgeryradiologic–pathologic correlationradiomicsresidual disease

Identifiers

PMID41590541
PMCPMC12842985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.