ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Current Trends in Venous Thromboprophylaxis for Inpatient Care.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients is a critical component of care aimed at preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common and potentially fatal complication during hospitalization. The risk of VTE varies substantially across patient populations, influenced by the type of illness, including both surgical procedures and medical comorbidities, and requires individualized assessment. At the same time, the implementation of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis must carefully balance the risk of thrombosis against the potential for bleeding. Commonly used risk assessment models, such as the Padua and IMPROVE scores, can help clinicians stratify patients according to their individual risk of VTE and bleeding complications. The aim of the present review is to provide a structured synthesis of the current evidence on thromboprophylaxis strategies in hospitalized patients, critically appraise the performance and applicability of existing VTE and bleeding risk models and highlight how these tools can guide a tailored illness-specific approach to prophylactic decision-making. Where relevant, the review also outlines practical, risk-adapted algorithms to optimize thromboprophylaxis across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.