ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib and Platin-Based Chemotherapy Plus Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: How to Choose Among Them and When Is Monotherapy with Osimertinib Still the Best Option?
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Correction: Maione et al. Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib and Platin-Based Chemotherapy Plus Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: How to Choose Among Them and When Is Monotherapy with Osimertinib Still the Best Option?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Does the ERBB/EGF Signaling Network Serve as a Nexus for Oncogenic Signals in Uveal Melanoma?Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last year, great advances in the treatment outcomes of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC have been achieved. Two combination regimens, amivantamab plus lazertinib and platin-based chemotherapy plus osimertinib, have yielded, in the phase III randomized trials named MARIPOSA and FLAURA 2, statistically and clinically significant improvements in overall survival compared with monotherapy with osimertinib. However, translation to clinical practice of these relevant results is challenging for two main reasons. The first is that we have no evidence-based tools to choose among the two combinations, except their different safety profiles. The second is that combinations are significantly more toxic than osimertinib alone. Thus, osimertinib remains an effective treatment with an excellent safety profile, perhaps to be considered as still the best option in the majority of elderly patients and in all patients that do not intend to trade-off an excess of toxicity with survival prolongment. The safety and efficacy characteristics of the three treatment options are the basis for a patient-tailored treatment choice, but in a significant proportion of patients, a personal and intimate approach to quality of life and survival prolongment is to be considered the main driver within a well-structured shared decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.