Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590360›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

Outpatient Surgery in Neuro-Oncology-Advancing Patient Access and Care.

Patrick E Steadman, Mark Bernstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick E SteadmanDivision of Neurosurgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Mark BernsteinDivision of Neurosurgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outpatient neurosurgical oncology has expanded with advances in anesthesia, imaging, and minimally invasive techniques, enabling safe same-day discharge for selected patients undergoing procedures such as stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy. In this review, we find that across multiple international series, same-day discharge rates in several studies ranging from 85 to 95%, with low complication (3-6%) and readmission rates when structured pathways, including standardized selection criteria, enhanced recovery protocols, and routine 4-h postoperative CT imaging, are used. Studies on economic analyses demonstrate substantial cost savings driven by reduced inpatient bed utilization, with no increase in adverse events. Key challenges identified include medicolegal concerns amongst physicians, patient education, and limitations in organization adoption. Telemedicine and remote monitoring are increasingly incorporated to streamline preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up, improving access and continuity of care. Emerging technologies such as laser interstitial thermal therapy and focused ultrasound may further expand the outpatient neuro-oncology repertoire. Overall, current evidence supports outpatient neurosurgical oncology as a safe, efficient, and patient-centered model when applied with structured clinical pathways and patient selection.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresBrain NeoplasmsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansbiopsybrain tumorcomplicationsday surgeryOmmaya reservoiroutpatientresectionresource utilizationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID41590360
PMCPMC12840173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.