ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Machine Learning in Biomarker-Driven Precision Oncology: Automated Immunohistochemistry Scoring and Emerging Directions in Genitourinary Cancers.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic and Prognostic Support in Breast Cancer: A Literature Overview.Cancers · 2026Review
- Advances and Future Directions in Antibody-Drug Conjugates: From Paradigm Shifts to Data-Driven Design.Cancers · 2026Review
- Automated H-Scoring in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer IHC: An Internal Validation Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in prostate biopsy: diagnostic applications, risk stratification, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A Systematic Literature Review on Integrated Deep Learning and Multiagent Vision-Language Frameworks for Pathology Image Analysis and Report Generation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is essential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarker assessment in oncology, but manual interpretation is limited by subjectivity and inter-observer variability. Machine learning (ML), a computational subset of AI that allows algorithms to recognise patterns and learn from annotated datasets to make predictions or decisions, has led to advancements in digital pathology by supporting automated quantification of biomarker expression on whole-slide images (WSIs). This review evaluates the role of ML-assisted IHC scoring in the transition from validated biomarkers to the discovery of emerging prognostic and predictive IHC biomarkers for genitourinary (GU) tumours. Current applications include ML-based scoring of routinely used biomarkers such as ER/PR, HER2, mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, PD-L1, and Ki-67, demonstrating improved consistency and scalability. Emerging studies in GU cancers show that algorithms can quantify markers including androgen receptor (AR), PTEN, cytokeratins, Uroplakin II, Nectin-4 and immune checkpoint proteins, with early evidence indicating associations between ML-derived metrics and clinical outcomes. Important limitations remain, including limited availability of training datasets, variability in staining protocols, and regulatory challenges. Overall, ML-assisted IHC scoring is a reproducible and evolving approach that may support biomarker discovery and enhance precision GU oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.