ArticleBiosensors2026
Regulation of Synaptic Plasticity and Adaptive Convergence Under Rhythmic Stimulation of an In Vitro Hippocampal Neuronal Network of Cultured Cells.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synaptic plasticity constitutes a fundamental mechanism of neural systems. Rhythmic activities (e.g., θ and γ oscillations) play a critical role in modulating network plasticity efficiency in biological neural systems. However, the rules governing plasticity and adaptive regulation of in vitro cultured networks under structured electrical stimulation remain insufficiently characterized. To quantitatively investigate these regulatory effects within a highly controlled and low-interference environment, we utilized primary mice hippocampal neurons cultured on multielectrode arrays (MEAs) and executed two dedicated sets of experiments. (1) Spatiotemporal electrical stimulation paradigms, combined with connectivity analysis, revealed pronounced regulation effects of network plasticity. (2) Physiologically inspired rhythmic stimulation (θ: 7.8 Hz, γ: 40 Hz) with varying pulse repetitions was then applied. Although both rhythms induced distinct frequency-dependent plasticity modulation, the disparity between their modulatory effects progressively diminished with increasing stimulation pulse numbers, suggesting an intrinsic adaptive regulatory mechanism. Collectively, our findings characterize the effects of plasticity regulation and reveal the mechanisms underlying adaptive convergence in in vitro neuronal systems. These results advance the understanding of network plasticity, providing a technical foundation for functional shaping and modulation of in vitro neural networks while supporting future explorations into learning-oriented modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.