Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590283›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2026

Noise Sources and Strategies for Signal Quality Improvement in Biological Imaging: A Review Focused on Calcium and Cell Membrane Voltage Imaging.

Dmitrii M Nikolaev, Ekaterina M Metelkina, Andrey A Shtyrov, Fanghua Li, Maxim S Panov, Mikhail N Ryazantsev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dmitrii M NikolaevInstitute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-9490
Ekaterina M MetelkinaInstitute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Andrey A ShtyrovCenter for Biophysical Studies, St. Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University, Professor Popov Str. 14 lit. A, Saint Petersburg 197022, Russia.
Fanghua LiNational Engineering Research Center for Safe Disposal and Resources Recovery of Sludge, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-6106
Maxim S PanovInstitute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6817-407X
Mikhail N RyazantsevInstitute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3413-1706

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-73-00041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review addresses the challenges of obtaining high-quality quantitative data in the optical imaging of membrane voltage and calcium dynamics. The paper provides a comprehensive overview and systematization of recent studies that analyze factors limiting signal fidelity and propose strategies to enhance data quality. The primary sources of signal degradation in biological optical imaging, with an emphasis on membrane voltage and calcium imaging, are systematically explored across four major indicator classes: voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs), genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs), calcium-sensitive dyes (CSDs), and genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs). Common mechanisms that compromise data quality are classified into three main categories: fundamental photon shot noise, device-related errors, and sample-related measurement errors. For each class of limitation, its physical or biological origin and characteristic manifestations are described, which are followed by an analysis of available mitigation strategies, including hardware optimization, choice of sensors, sample preparation and experimental design, post-processing and computational correction methods.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCalciumCell MembraneOptical ImagingVoltage-Sensitive Dye ImagingAnimalsHumansMembrane PotentialsSignal-To-Noise RatioCalciumbiological imagingcalcium-sensitive dye (CSD)cell membrane voltagegenetically encoded calcium indicator (GECI)genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI)membrane voltage imagingoptical imagingsignal-to-noise ratio (SNR)voltage-sensitive dye (VSD)

Identifiers

PMID41590283
PMCPMC12838810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.