ReviewBiosensors2026
Noise Sources and Strategies for Signal Quality Improvement in Biological Imaging: A Review Focused on Calcium and Cell Membrane Voltage Imaging.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-Scale Neural Recording Technologies for Investigating Circuit Dysfunction and Functional Biomarker Discovery in Animal Models of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond Membrane Potential: Exploiting Signal Complexity in Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review addresses the challenges of obtaining high-quality quantitative data in the optical imaging of membrane voltage and calcium dynamics. The paper provides a comprehensive overview and systematization of recent studies that analyze factors limiting signal fidelity and propose strategies to enhance data quality. The primary sources of signal degradation in biological optical imaging, with an emphasis on membrane voltage and calcium imaging, are systematically explored across four major indicator classes: voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs), genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs), calcium-sensitive dyes (CSDs), and genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs). Common mechanisms that compromise data quality are classified into three main categories: fundamental photon shot noise, device-related errors, and sample-related measurement errors. For each class of limitation, its physical or biological origin and characteristic manifestations are described, which are followed by an analysis of available mitigation strategies, including hardware optimization, choice of sensors, sample preparation and experimental design, post-processing and computational correction methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.