ReviewBiosensors2025
Artificial Intelligence-Aided Microfluidic Cell Culture Systems.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic cell culture systems and organ-on-a-chip platforms provide powerful tools for modeling physiological processes, disease progression, and drug responses under controlled microenvironmental conditions. These technologies rely on diverse cell culture methodologies, including 2D and 3D culture formats, spheroids, scaffold-based systems, hydrogels, and organoid models, to recapitulate tissue-level functions and generate rich, multiparametric datasets through high-resolution imaging, integrated sensors, and biochemical assays. The heterogeneity and volume of these data introduce substantial challenges in pre-processing, feature extraction, multimodal integration, and biological interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, offers solutions to these analytical bottlenecks by enabling automated phenotyping, predictive modeling, and real-time control of microfluidic environments. Recent advances also highlight the importance of technical frameworks such as dimensionality reduction, explainable feature selection, spectral pre-processing, lightweight on-chip inference models, and privacy-preserving approaches that support robust and deployable AI-microfluidic workflows. AI-enabled microfluidic and organ-on-a-chip systems now span a broad application spectrum, including cancer biology, drug screening, toxicity testing, microbial and environmental monitoring, pathogen detection, angiogenesis studies, nerve-on-a-chip models, and exosome-based diagnostics. These platforms also hold increasing potential for precision medicine, where AI can support individualized therapeutic prediction using patient-derived cells and organoids. As the field moves toward more interpretable and autonomous systems, explainable AI will be essential for ensuring transparency, regulatory acceptance, and biological insight. Recent AI-enabled applications in cancer modeling, drug screening, etc., highlight how deep learning can enable precise detection of phenotypic shifts, classify therapeutic responses with high accuracy, and support closed-loop regulation of microfluidic environments. These studies demonstrate that AI can transform microfluidic systems from static culture platforms into adaptive, data-driven experimental tools capable of enhancing assay reproducibility, accelerating drug discovery, and supporting personalized therapeutic decision-making. This narrative review synthesizes current progress, technical challenges, and future opportunities at the intersection of AI, microfluidic cell culture platforms, and advanced organ-on-a-chip systems, highlighting their emerging role in precision health and next-generation biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.