ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical Patterns of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium Use in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuromuscular blockade (NMB) is frequently used in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to optimize ventilatory synchrony and minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. However, comparative real-world data on different NMB strategies remain limited.
objectiveTo describe patterns of neuromuscular blockade use in ARDS and describe clinical outcomes across four NMB strategies: intermittent rocuronium, continuous cisatracurium, escalation from rocuronium to cisatracurium, and de-escalation from cisatracurium to rocuronium.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted in an 18-bed tertiary ICU at Hôpital Montfort (Ottawa, Canada) between November 2021 and March 2025. Adult ARDS patients who received NMB for >24 h were included. Continuous variables (age, ventilation time, ICU stay) were summarized as means ± SD and median [IQR]; categorical variables (sex, ARDS etiology, mortality) as counts and percentages. Inferential testing was limited to baseline characteristics; clinical outcomes were summarized descriptively.
resultsFifty-one patients met inclusion criteria: rocuronium (
conclusionsDistinct NMB use patterns in ARDS reflect bedside clinical judgment rather than predefined thresholds. Patient trajectory and dyssynchrony severity appear to drive NMBA escalation decisions more than oxygenation indices alone. These findings highlight the need for prospective studies defining standardized criteria for NMB initiation, escalation, and weaning in ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.