ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Injectable Scaffolds for Adipose Tissue Reconstruction.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hyaluronic Acid-Based Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering: From Molecular Properties to Re-Generative Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous fat grafting is the main surgical technique for soft tissue reconstruction. However, its clinical use with more extended volumes is limited by repeated procedures due to the little possibility of banking tissue, donor-site morbidity and unpredictable graft resorption rates. To overcome these problems, adipose tissue engineering has focused on developing injectable scaffolds. Most of them are hydrogels that closely mimic the biological, structural and mechanical characteristics of native adipose tissue. This review provides an overview of current injectable scaffolds designed to restore soft tissue volume defects, emphasizing their translational potential and future directions. Natural injectable scaffolds exhibit excellent biocompatibility but degrade rapidly and lack mechanical strength. Synthetic injectable scaffolds provide tunable elasticity and degradation rates but require biofunctionalization to support cell adhesion and tissue integration. Adipose extracellular matrix-derived injectable scaffolds are fabricated by decellularization of adipose tissue. Accordingly, they combine bio-mimetic structure with intrinsic biological cues that stimulate host-driven adipogenesis and angiogenesis, thus representing a translatable "off-the-shelf" alternative to autologous fat grafting. However, despite this broad spectrum of available injectable scaffolds, the establishment of clinically reliable soft tissue substitutes capable of supporting large-volume and long-lasting soft tissue reconstruction still remains an open challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.