Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590106›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Injectable Scaffolds for Adipose Tissue Reconstruction.

Valeria Pruzzo, Francesca Bonomi, Ettore Limido, Andrea Weinzierl, Yves Harder, Matthias W Laschke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valeria PruzzoInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, PharmaScienceHub (PSH), 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Francesca BonomiInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, PharmaScienceHub (PSH), 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Ettore LimidoInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, PharmaScienceHub (PSH), 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Andrea WeinzierlInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, PharmaScienceHub (PSH), 66421 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2449-2698
Yves HarderDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-249X
Matthias W LaschkeInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, PharmaScienceHub (PSH), 66421 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-8456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous fat grafting is the main surgical technique for soft tissue reconstruction. However, its clinical use with more extended volumes is limited by repeated procedures due to the little possibility of banking tissue, donor-site morbidity and unpredictable graft resorption rates. To overcome these problems, adipose tissue engineering has focused on developing injectable scaffolds. Most of them are hydrogels that closely mimic the biological, structural and mechanical characteristics of native adipose tissue. This review provides an overview of current injectable scaffolds designed to restore soft tissue volume defects, emphasizing their translational potential and future directions. Natural injectable scaffolds exhibit excellent biocompatibility but degrade rapidly and lack mechanical strength. Synthetic injectable scaffolds provide tunable elasticity and degradation rates but require biofunctionalization to support cell adhesion and tissue integration. Adipose extracellular matrix-derived injectable scaffolds are fabricated by decellularization of adipose tissue. Accordingly, they combine bio-mimetic structure with intrinsic biological cues that stimulate host-driven adipogenesis and angiogenesis, thus representing a translatable "off-the-shelf" alternative to autologous fat grafting. However, despite this broad spectrum of available injectable scaffolds, the establishment of clinically reliable soft tissue substitutes capable of supporting large-volume and long-lasting soft tissue reconstruction still remains an open challenge.

Indexed as

adipose tissue engineeringdecellularized adipose tissueextracellular matrixfat graft retentionhydrogelinjectable scaffoldsoft tissue reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41590106
PMCPMC12840662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.