Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590025›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026

Translating and Validating the Ghosting Questionnaire (GHOST) into French: Results Against the Romantic Ghosting Scale (RG-C).

Haitham Jahrami, Waqar Husain, Zahra Saif, Achraf Ammar, Khaled Trabelsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haitham JahramiGovernment Hospitals, Manama 329, Bahrain.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-1320
Waqar HusainDepartment of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad Campus, Park Road, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-1834
Zahra SaifGovernment Hospitals, Manama 329, Bahrain.
Achraf AmmarDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-8053
Khaled TrabelsiResearch Laboratory Education, Motricité, Sport et Santé, EM2S, LR19JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3000, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-9557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGhosting, the sudden cessation of communication without explanation, is a growing phenomenon in digital interactions.

objectiveThis study translated and validated the Ghosting Questionnaire (GHOST) into French to address the lack of a culturally appropriate tool for French-speaking populations.

methodsUsing a cross-sectional design, we followed rigorous translation protocols, including forward and back translation, expert review, and pilot testing. A diverse group of 274 French-speaking adults participated in a multisite study in Bahrain and Tunisia by completing the French language GHOST and the Romantic Ghosting Scale (RG-C).

resultsPsychometric analyses revealed strong reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.880, test-retest ICC = 0.920) and a unidimensional structure (CFI = 0.963, RMSEA = 0.058). Convergent validity was confirmed through significant correlations with RG-C subscales: Role of Aggressor (r = 0.899), Role of Victim (r = 0.829), and Emotional Impact (r = 0.632, all

conclusionsThe French GHOST offers a robust instrument for researchers and clinicians to explore ghosting's psychological impacts in French-speaking communities.

Indexed as

communicationdigital relationshipssocial behaviorvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41590025
PMCPMC12840152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.