ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multi-Strategy Improved Pelican Optimization Algorithm for Engineering Optimization Problems and 3D UAV Path Planning.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the path-planning challenge for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in complex environments, this study presents an improved pelican optimization algorithm enhanced with multiple strategies (MIPOA). The proposed method introduces four main improvements: (1) using chaotic mapping to spread the initial search points more evenly, thereby increasing population variety; (2) incorporating a random Lévy-flight strategy to improve the exploration of the search space; (3) integrating a differential evolution approach based on Cauchy mutation to strengthen individual diversity and overall optimization ability; and (4) adopting an adaptive disturbance factor to speed up convergence and fine-tune solutions. To evaluate MIPOA, comparative tests were carried out against classical and modern intelligent algorithms using the CEC2017 and CEC2022 benchmark sets, along with a custom UAV environmental model. Results show that MIPOA converges faster and achieves more accurate solutions than the original pelican optimization algorithm (POA). On CEC2017 in 30-, 50-, and 100-dimensional cases, MIPOA attained the best average ranks of 1.57, 2.37, and 2.90, respectively, and achieved the top results on 26, 21, and 19 test functions, outperforming both POA and other advanced algorithms. For CEC2022 (20 dimensions), MIPOA obtained the highest Friedman average rank of 1.42, demonstrating its effectiveness in complex UAV path-planning tasks. The method enables the generation of faster, shorter, safer, and collision-free flight paths for UAVs, underscoring the robustness and wide applicability of MIPOA in real-world UAV path-planning scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.