ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Black-Winged Kite Algorithm Integrating Opposition-Based Learning and Quasi-Newton Strategy.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Enhanced Black-Winged Kite Algorithm with Multiple Strategies for Global Optimization and Constrained Engineering Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the deficiencies in global search capability and population diversity decline of the black-winged kite algorithm (BKA), this paper proposes an enhanced black-winged kite algorithm integrating opposition-based learning and quasi-Newton strategy (OQBKA). The algorithm introduces a mirror imaging strategy based on convex lens imaging (MOBL) during the migration phase to enhance the population's spatial distribution and assist individuals in escaping local optima. In later iterations, it incorporates the quasi-Newton method to enhance local optimization precision and convergence performance. Ablation studies on the CEC2017 benchmark set confirm the strong complementarity between the two integrated strategies, with OQBKA achieving an average ranking of 1.34 across all 29 test functions. Comparative experiments on the CEC2022 benchmark suite further verify its superior exploration-exploitation balance and optimization accuracy: under 10- and 20-dimensional settings, OQBKA attains the best average rankings of 2.5 and 2.17 across all 12 test functions, outperforming ten state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. Moreover, evaluations on three constrained engineering design problems, including step-cone pulley optimization, corrugated bulkhead design, and reactor network design, demonstrate the practicality and robustness of the proposed approach in generating feasible solutions under complex constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.