ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Research Progress on Biomimetic Water Collection Materials.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water scarcity constitutes a major global challenge. Biomimetic water collection materials, which mimic the efficient water capture and transport mechanisms, offer a crucial approach to addressing the water crisis. This review summarizes the research progress on biomimetic water collection materials, focusing on biological prototypes, operational mechanisms, and core aspects of biomimetic design. Typical water-collecting biological surfaces in nature exhibit distinctive structure-function synergy: spider silk achieves directional droplet transport via periodic spindle-knot structures, utilizing Laplace pressure difference and surface energy gradient; the desert beetle's back features hydrophilic microstructures and a hydrophobic waxy coating, forming a fog-water collection system based on heterogeneous wettability; cactus spines enhance droplet transport efficiency through the synergy of gradient grooves and barbs; and shorebird beaks enable rapid water convergence via liquid bridge effects. These biological prototypes provide vital inspiration for the design of biomimetic water collection materials. Drawing on biological mechanisms, researchers have developed diverse biomimetic water collection materials. This review offers a theoretical reference for their structural design and performance enhancement, highlighting bio-inspiration's core value in high-efficiency water collection material development. Additionally, this paper discusses challenges and opportunities of these materials, providing insights for advancing the engineering application of next-generation high-efficiency biomimetic water collection materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.