ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
EODE-PFA: A Multi-Strategy Enhanced Pathfinder Algorithm for Engineering Optimization and Feature Selection.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Pathfinder Algorithm (PFA) is a bionic swarm intelligence optimization algorithm inspired by simulating the cooperative movement of animal groups in nature to search for prey. Based on fitness, the algorithm classifies search individuals into leaders and followers. However, PFA fails to effectively balance the optimization capabilities of leaders and followers, leading to problems such as insufficient population diversity and slow convergence speed in the original algorithm. To address these issues, this paper proposes an enhanced pathfinder algorithm based on multi-strategy (EODE-PFA). Through the synergistic effects of multiple improved strategies, it effectively solves the balance problem between global exploration and local optimization of the algorithm. To verify the performance of EODE-PFA, this paper applies it to CEC2022 benchmark functions, three types of complex engineering optimization problems, and six sets of feature selection problems, respectively, and compares it with eight mature optimization algorithms. Experimental results show that in three different scenarios, EODE-PFA has significant advantages and competitiveness in both convergence speed and solution accuracy, fully verifying its engineering practicality and scenario universality. To highlight the synergistic effects and overall gains of multiple improved strategies, ablation experiments are conducted on key strategies. To further verify the statistical significance of the experimental results, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test is performed in this study. In addition, for feature selection problems, this study selects UCI real datasets with different real-world scenarios and dimensions, and the results show that the algorithm can still effectively balance exploration and exploitation capabilities in discrete scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.