Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589968›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Automated Facial Pain Assessment Using Dual-Attention CNN with Clinically Calibrated High-Reliability and Reproducibility Framework.

Albert Patrick Sankoh, Ali Raza, Khadija Parwez, Wesam Shishah, Ayman Alharbi, Mubeen Javed, Muhammad Bilal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Albert Patrick SankohKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ali RazaCollege of Underwater Acoustic Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5366-8045
Khadija ParwezDepartment of Computing and Technology, Iqra University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0007-6971-8140
Wesam ShishahInformation Technology Department, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6947-9927
Ayman AlharbiComputer and Network Engineering Department, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5995-5771
Mubeen JavedCollege of Underwater Acoustic Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150009, China.
Muhammad BilalSchool of Engineering, Nanfang College Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510970, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8221-2389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and quantitative pain assessment remains a major challenge in clinical medicine, especially for patients unable to verbalize discomfort. Conventional methods based on self-reports or clinician observation are subjective and inconsistent. This study introduces a novel automated facial pain assessment framework built on a dual-attention convolutional neural network (CNN) that achieves clinically calibrated, high-reliability performance and interpretability. The architecture combines multi-head spatial attention to localize pain-relevant facial regions with an enhanced channel attention block employing triple-pooling (average, max, and standard deviation) to capture discriminative intensity features. Regularization through label smoothing (α = 0.1) and AdamW optimization ensures calibrated, stable convergence. Evaluated on a clinically annotated dataset using subject-wise stratified sampling, the proposed model achieved a test accuracy of 90.19% ± 0.94%, with an average 5-fold cross-validation accuracy of 83.60% ± 1.55%. The model further attained an F1-score of 0.90 and Cohen's κ = 0.876, with macro- and micro-AUCs of 0.991 and 0.992, respectively. The evaluation covers five pain classes (No Pain, Mid Pain, Moderate Pain, Severe Pain, and Very Pain) using subject-wise splits comprising 5840 total images and 1160 test samples. Comparative benchmarking and ablation experiments confirm each module's contribution, while Grad-CAM visualizations highlight physiologically relevant facial regions. The results demonstrate a robust, explainable, and reproducible framework suitable for integration into real-world automated pain-monitoring systems. Inspired by biological pain perception mechanisms and human facial muscle responses, the proposed framework aligns with biomimetic sensing principles by emulating how localized facial cues contribute to pain interpretation.

Indexed as

AdamW optimizationclinical calibrationclinical decision supportdual-attention convolutional neural network (CNN)facial pain assessmenthealthcare artificial intelligence (AI)high-reliability AIlabel smoothing

Identifiers

PMID41589968
PMCPMC12838980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.