ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comprehensive Review of Computational and Experimental Studies on Skin Mechanics and Meshing: Discrepancies, Challenges, and Optimization Strategies.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin meshing is widely used to treat extensive burn injuries due to its cost-efficiency and capacity to cover large wound areas. As biomimetics focuses on deriving engineering principles from biological structure-function relationships, this review examines how to optimize skin-meshing expansion and investigates factors contributing to reported discrepancies between clinical and manufacturer-reported expansion ratios. The biology and mechanical behavior of skin layer are discussed, emphasizing the anisotropic properties govern by collagen fiber orientation associated with Langer's lines in the dermis. The epidermis and hypodermis show isotropic properties and therefore have minimal influence on load-bearing capacity. Surveying 111 studies, the review evaluates which constitutive equations employed for skin modelling is suitable to replicate mechanical behavior of skin meshing undergoing large expansion. Elastic models fail to capture large expansion ratios. Viscoelastic and QLV are excluded due to negligible sliding of collagen fibers at slow strain rates and limited importance of hysteresis. Consequently, hyperelastic models are recognized as more suitable for predicting large deformations. Among these, the structural GOH model, which represents fiber dispersion through a probability-density function, demonstrates strong agreement with experimental data using few parameters; its damage extensions improve prediction of mesh tearing. Additionally, emerging auxetic mesh geometries with negative Poisson ratios are examined, highlighting their potential to achieve greater expansion when combined with suitable structural anisotropic constitutive models, e.g., GOH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.