ArticleJournal of virology2026
MPXV RNA-seq data provide evidence for protection of viral transcripts from APOBEC3 editing.
Article in Journal of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 2022 outbreak of monkeypox virus (MPXV), a double-stranded DNA virus, is remarkable for an unusually high number of single-nucleotide substitutions compared to earlier strains, with a strong bias toward C→T and G→A transitions consistent with the APOBEC3 cytidine deaminase activity. While APOBEC3-induced mutagenesis is well documented at the DNA level, its potential impact on MPXV RNA transcripts remains unclear. To assess whether APOBEC3 enzymes act on MPXV RNA, we analyzed RNA-seq data from infected samples. The enrichment of APOBEC signature substitutions among high-frequency mismatched positions led us to consider two possibilities: RNA editing at hotspots or fixed DNA mutations. Multiple lines of evidence support the conclusion that these substitutions arise from DNA-level mutagenesis rather than RNA editing. These include a substantial number of G→A substitutions remaining after normalization by gene strand direction, a largely neutral impact of substitutions on protein-coding sequences, the lack of positional correlation with transcriptional features or RNA secondary structure typically associated with APOBEC action hotspots, and an overlap with known genomic mutations in MPXV strains. Analysis of the nucleotide context of observed substitutions indicated that APOBEC3A or APOBEC3B was likely a driver of DNA-level mutagenesis.IMPORTANCEThe 2022 monkeypox virus (MPXV) outbreak showed an unusually high number of mutations thought to result from human antiviral enzymes of the APOBEC3 family. While such mutations have been clearly documented in the viral DNA, whether APOBEC3 also edits viral messenger RNA molecules remained unclear. In this study, we analyzed multiple publicly available MPXV RNA sequencing datasets to address this question. We found that the apparent APOBEC-like changes in RNA are best explained by fixed DNA mutations rather than active RNA editing. This finding helps clarify how MPXV evolves and adapts, suggesting that APOBEC3's role in shaping the virus likely operates at the DNA level. Understanding where and how these mutations occur provides insight into the virus's interaction with the human immune system and informs future studies on viral evolution and antiviral defenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.