Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589863›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2026

Advantages, limitations, and innovative considerations for established and emerging models of human placental syncytiotrophoblast.

Joshua J Fisher, Ashley Williams, Farhad Soheilmoghaddam, Georgia R Kafer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua J FisherMothers and Babies Research Centre, Hunter Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0505-0598
Ashley WilliamsSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, Queensland, Australia.
Farhad SoheilmoghaddamSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, Queensland, Australia.
Georgia R KaferSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5438-0497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the mechanisms that promote or hinder healthy placental development and functionality is fundamental to advancing the field of fetal and reproductive medicine. Syncytiotrophoblast (STB) are highly specialized trophoblast which develop and gain functional maturity during the first trimester of pregnancy. STB are critical to many placental functions and are often implicated in the etiology of placental pathologies. Recent advancements in cell biology have facilitated the development of innovative in vitro STB model systems. However, as the variety of available in vitro STB models grows, a critical assessment of the strengths, limitations, and appropriate applications of both established and emerging model systems is important for the field. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: With this review, we set out to compile and synthesize current knowledge on in vitro modeling of STB. Using this information, we sought to develop a balanced and thoughtful discussion regarding the use and suitability of various in vitro STB models. Our approach is grounded in a framework that considers placental development and physiology, with a specific focus on the capability of different models to recapitulate and thus enable the study of human STB differentiation, development, function, and dysfunction. SEARCH

methodThis review assessed published literature sourced through the PubMed database. Search terms included 'human placenta models,' 'syncytiotrophoblast models,' 'syncytiotrophoblast development,' 'trophoblast stem cells,' 'trophoblast organoids,' and 'trophoblast cell models.' The literature search was limited to English-language publications available up to August 2025. OUTCOMES: We provide a narrative which explores the features, potential applications, and limitations of various STB models, including explant systems, immortalized trophoblast cell lines, stem cell-derived trophoblast, and a range of established and emerging 3D culture systems. Our evaluation focuses on the potential of each model to address specific research questions and highlights the challenges associated with modeling different stages of STB development and different unique aspects of STB functionality. Moreover, while remarkable progress in developing STB models has been made, no single system fully recapitulates the complex in vivo features of STB formation and function. Rather than being exhaustive, this review seeks to provide an evidence-based perspective on STB modeling in vitro which can encourage the careful consideration of the strengths and limitations of STB models. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: This review provides an overview of the in vitro STB models currently available and a commentary of the knowledge that these systems have contributed to our understanding of STB biology. While the field has made significant progress, ongoing refinement of existing models is essential for advancing our understanding of STB and their role in both the health and dysfunction of the human placenta. By summarizing the unique adaptations and physiological changes of STB throughout gestation and aligning these with the capabilities of current models, we have developed a framework to guide future research and innovation in STB modeling. This framework is underscored by the importance of selecting models which align with specific research questions and simultaneously acknowledging the inherent limitations in extrapolating data from any in vitro systems to the biological context of the developing human placenta. By generating this discussion, we hope to contribute to the ongoing refinement of placental research methodologies and to inspire continued innovation in STB model systems. REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlacentaPlacentationTrophoblastsCell DifferentiationFemaleHumansPregnancyblastoidcytotrophoblastmodelorganoidplacentaplacental developmentplacental dysfunctionsyncytiotrophoblastsyncytiumtrophoblast

Identifiers

PMID41589863
PMCPMC13139661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.