Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589850›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

From BioSkills to LifeSkills-a framework for developing life skills for non-science majors in introductory life science courses.

Davida S Smyth, Sam Donovan, Melanie Lenahan, Dayna DeFeo, Karla Fuller, Tamar L Goulet, Gabriela Hamerlinck, Elizabeth Harrison, Jaclyn Reeves-Pepin, Heather Rissler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Davida S SmythDepartment of Natural Sciences, Texas A&M University-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-0337
Sam DonovanBioQUEST Curriculum Consortium, Raymond, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4021-9878
Melanie LenahanDepartment of Science and Engineering, Raritan Valley Community College, Branchburg, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-8035
Dayna DeFeoCenter for Alaska Education Policy Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7638-3683
Karla FullerScience and Math Department, Guttmann Community College, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-9557
Tamar L GouletDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3883-6543
Gabriela HamerlinckDepartment of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5794-6516
Elizabeth HarrisonDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA.
Jaclyn Reeves-PepinNational Association of Biology Teachers, Heber City, Utah, USA.
Heather RisslerSchool of Medicine, KU Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Gordon UnoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4121-4035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over a decade ago, the national "Vision and Change" report articulated the critical need to reform undergraduate biology education. Since its introduction, reform efforts guided by V&C have focused primarily on the biology major, with less attention to the distinct needs of non-major students in General Education (GenEd) life science courses. For most college students, a life science course represents the only opportunity to develop scientific literacy, a critical skill for making informed decisions in an increasingly complex and science-driven world. The Interactions in General Education Life Science Courses (IGELS) project was developed as a response to the challenges of aligning biology education reform policy with the needs of non-science majors. The goal of the project was to define a framework of core competencies, tailored specifically for the distinct needs of undergraduate non-major life science students. The IGELS team built upon the existing "BioSkills Guide" and developed a "LifeSkills Guide," featuring a new set of 39 learning outcomes organized into five themes. The LifeSkills Guide is intended to support instructors as they shift the emphasis of their instruction from content coverage to developing transferable skills relevant to students' daily lives. Examples of how to implement the guide are demonstrated through classroom activities, such as a "Fake News" exercise, and pedagogical approaches like Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs), which can be mapped to multiple learning outcomes. The LifeSkills Guide serves as a curated roadmap, providing resources to transform GenEd life science courses and empower our students, as members of society, to use evidence-based reasoning as they navigate personal, professional, and civic challenges.

Indexed as

competencieslifeskillsnon-majorsreasoningrelevancescientific literacySTEM

Identifiers

PMID41589850
PMCPMC13131004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.