ArticleJMIR mental health2026
Using Smartphone-Tracked Behavioral Markers to Recognize Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: Cross-Sectional Digital Phenotyping Study.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression and anxiety are prevalent but commonly missed and misdiagnosed, an important concern because many patients do not experience spontaneous recovery, and the duration of untreated illness is associated with worse outcomes. Objective: This study aims to explore the potential of using smartphone-tracked behavioral markers to support diagnostics and improve recognition of these disorders. Methods: We used the dedicated Behapp digital phenotyping platform to passively track location and app usage in 217 individuals, comprising symptomatic (n=109; depression/anxiety diagnosis or symptoms) and asymptomatic individuals (n=108; no diagnosis/symptoms). After quantifying 46 behavioral markers (eg, % time at home), we applied a machine learning approach to (1) determine which markers are relevant for depression/anxiety recognition and (2) develop and evaluate diagnostic prediction models for doing so. Results: Our analysis identifies the total number of GPS-based trajectories as a potential marker of depression/anxiety, where individuals with fewer trajectories are more likely to be symptomatic. Models using this feature in combination with demographics or in isolation outperformed demographics-only models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curveMdn=0.60 vs 0.60 vs 0.51). Conclusions: Collectively, these findings indicate that smartphone-tracked behavioral markers have limited discriminant ability in our study but potential to support future depression/anxiety diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.