ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026
Evaluation of Good Nursing Practices for women in situations of domestic violence.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify indicators used to evaluate Good Nursing Practices developed in Primary Health Care for women in situations of domestic violence.
methodA qualitative study conducted with primary care nurses in a Brazilian municipality. Semi-structured interviews were developed, and the Software WebQDA was used for data analysis. The analytical categories used were: gender violence and nursing care according to the Theory of Nursing Praxis Intervention in Collective Health.
resultsEmpirical categories emerged: 1) Conception of service evaluation by service users; 2) Evaluation practices: absence of a formal evaluation structure and professional self-evaluation; 3) Potential and used indicators for evaluating care.
conclusionTwo indicators already in use were identified, and others were proposed, highlighting the potential for building collaborative instruments. Despite the existence of protocols and policies, an evaluation tool is required, which can benefit from the theoretical and methodological guidance of the Theory of Nursing Praxis in Collective Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.