ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026
Clinical validation of ICNP® Terminological Subset for people with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo clinically validate the nursing diagnoses/outcomes and interventions statements of the CIPE® Subset for individuals with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis.
methodClinical validation study, with individuals aged 18 years or older, with chronic kidney disease, undergoing dialysis for at least three months. The research took place in three stages: Application of the Nursing Process to clinical practice, encompassing five essential steps - Nursing assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and progress notes; Structuring of case studies; and Identification of the prevalence of ND/NO and NI listed from the case studies. Data were analyzed using latent class analysis.
resultsThe findings revealed three distinct latent classes: low (Class 1), medium (Class 2), and high (Class 3) risk. The indicators showed high sensitivity (72.0% to 91.0%) and specificity (83.0% to 92.0%) values, confirming the clinical validity of the subset and the consistency of the model for discriminating different profiles of patients undergoing hemodialysis.
conclusionThe study clinically validated a subset of 23 nursing diagnoses/outcomes and 169 interventions, demonstrating their applicability in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.