ArticleJornal brasileiro de nefrologia
Overcorrection of severe hyponatremia, osmotic demyelination syndrome, and mortality: insights from two Brazilian centers.
Article in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hyponatremia and the risk of Osmotic Demyelination Syndrome: is it time to review sodium correction rates?Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSevere hyponatremia (sodium ≤ 120 mmol/L) poses significant clinical risks, including encephalopathy and seizures, but inadvertent rapid correction may cause osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). Current guidelines recommend limiting sodium correction to ≤8 mmol/L per 24 hours to minimize ODS risk. However, recent studies suggest that overcorrection may not directly contribute to mortality and could even be associated with improved outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 362 patients with severe hyponatremia admitted to two Brazilian tertiary hospitals. Overcorrection was defined as a serum sodium increase >8 mmol/L in 24 hours or >18 mmol/L in 48 hours. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score-weighted analyses were used to identify predictors and outcomes associated with overcorrection.
resultsOvercorrection occurred in 38.7% of patients whereas ODS occurred in only one patient (0.28%). Independent predictors of overcorrection included younger age, lower admission sodium levels, and higher volumes of 0.9% NaCl administered in the emergency room; cancer diagnosis and furosemide use were protective factors. Overcorrection was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and shorter hospital stays, even in propensity score-weighted multivariate analyses. However, a detailed review of mortality cases revealed no direct causal link between the rate of sodium correction and death.
conclusionOvercorrection of severe hyponatremia was common and associated with better clinical outcomes, without a significant increase in the risk of ODS. However, given the observational nature of this association, randomized controlled trials are needed before the current guidelines for correction rate can be reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.