ArticleIUCrJ2026
Automated microbatch-under-oil phase diagrams to rationalize serial crystallography sample preparation.
Article in IUCrJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serial crystallography relies on the reproducible production of high-density suspensions of microcrystals, yet sample optimization remains a resource-intensive bottleneck. While phase diagrams provide a theoretical framework for controlling crystal size and number, experimental mapping is traditionally hindered by relatively high sample consumption. We present an automated microbatch-under-oil crystallization approach that rapidly maps phase boundaries using only 15-60 µl (∼0.15-3.8 mg) of protein. While this workflow is ideally suited for refining existing hits, it serves as a standalone platform for characterizing the crystallization landscape of new protein targets. The power of this approach lies in the integration of three distinct strategies that exploit the stable chemical environment of microbatch-under-oil. Firstly, we utilize an ingenious diagonal sampling strategy that traverses the phase boundary parallel to the solubility curve by systematically varying protein-to-precipitant ratios, identifying primary nucleation zones with far greater efficiency than traditional orthogonal grids. Secondly, we employ a linked variation of multiple precipitants to reveal morphology-specific regions, such as the rod versus plate transitions crucial for time-resolved experiments. Finally, we incorporate automated seed-stock titration to precisely define the metastable zone, enabling the predictive rescue of nucleation-limited systems. The synergy of these three strategies enables the systematic decoupling of nucleation from growth, providing a rational route to optimize microcrystal density, size and lattice order. Crucially, by eliminating the evaporation-related variables inherent in vapor diffusion, this method ensures that the chemical coordinates identified during screening remain constant during scale-up to larger volumes. This workflow transforms empirical serial crystallography sample preparation into a rational, reproducible and highly efficient process applicable to both the optimization of known conditions and the de novo development of microcrystal suspensions, tailored to the rigorous demands of modern serial diffraction experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.