Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589302›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2025

Ribosome plasticity in glioblastoma: a multi-omics framework for future investigation.

Dario Benelli, Christian Barbato, Carlo Cogoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dario BenelliDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Christian BarbatoInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC), National Research Council (CNR), 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Carlo CogoniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a challenging tumour to mechanistically dissect, in part because of its capacity to adapt to hypoxia, metabolic imbalance and therapeutic pressure. Across cancer biology more broadly, attention has increasingly turned to ribosomal proteins (RPs). Although long regarded as stable structural components of the ribosome, several RPs show variation across tumour regions, stress states and differentiation trajectories. In some cancers, specific RPs have been mechanistically linked to selective translation or cell-state transitions, whereas in others the evidence remains largely associative. Overall, current observations leave open the question of whether RP variation reflects active regulatory roles or instead mirrors the broader physiological pressures experienced by malignant cells. In this mini review, we summarise what multi-omics approaches-including transcriptomics, proteomics and translatomics-currently reveal about RP regulation in GBM. Rather than making firm causal claims, we outline the main interpretations proposed so far, the uncertainties that complicate them and the conceptual gaps that keep the field open. Our aim is to provide a balanced and cautious overview that may help frame future work on how ribosomal components and the translational machinery could contribute to GBM plasticity.

Indexed as

glioblastomamulti-omicsribosomal proteinsribosome biogenesisribosome heterogeneitytranslational regulationtumour plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41589302
PMCPMC12832113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.