Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589275›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current and Evolving Concepts.

Christopher Fernainy, Amritpal S Randhawa, Matthew Frederickson, Mariano E Menendez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher FernainyUniversity of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3382-6813
Amritpal S RandhawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1262-3014
Matthew FredericksonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9783-3604
Mariano E MenendezDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0392-7050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

» Conventional treatment of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) consists of prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotics injected into a PICC line. This method can be associated with adverse events such as catheter-related infections, extended hospitalizations, and higher medical costs. » The OVIVA trial demonstrated that oral antibiotics are no less effective than IV antibiotics as previously thought for complex orthopedic infections. These findings have sparked interest in the use of oral antibiotics for shoulder PJI. » Current data on the use of oral antibiotics in shoulder PJI is limited but growing. A number of studies assess the effects of oral antibiotic therapy on the shoulder, with most being small and retrospective. » Early evidence in shoulder PJI suggests that oral antibiotic therapy may provide satisfactory outcomes in select cases, though confirmation in high-quality, multicenter trials is essential.

Identifiers

PMID41589275
PMCPMC12826257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.