ArticleHealth information science and systems2026
Machine learning models for volume and weight estimation in breast reconstruction planning.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate estimation of breast volume and weight is critical for post-mastectomy reconstruction. Existing methods are frequently costly or complex. We developed a machine learning framework that leverages demographic and anthropometric data to address these challenges. Methods: We collected data from 199 patients between 2021 and 2023. The workflow comprised data collection, pre-processing, feature selection, model training, and performance evaluation. Three feature selection techniques were applied: domain expert knowledge, Spearman's rank correlation, and the Boruta algorithm. Each feature set was used to train linear regression, random forest regression, and support vector regression models. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R Results: The optimal linear regression model, which incorporated both domain-expert and statistically selected features, achieved R Conclusion: The results indicate that integrating demographic and anthropometric data with machine learning yields an accurate, interpretable, and accessible method for preoperative breast assessment. In contrast to conventional imaging or mathematical models, this approach eliminates costs related to imaging equipment, relies on routinely collected clinical data, reduces the need for specialized equipment and training, and enables rapid integration into existing clinical workflows. By overcoming the limitations of traditional methods, the proposed model provides a practical, efficient, and cost-effective solution for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.