ArticleCureus2025
Validation of Peak Growth Hormone Levels After Clonidine and Glucagon Stimulation Tests in Children With Severe Short Stature.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glucagon-stimulated copeptin response in children: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study evaluated the concordance and temporal dynamics of growth hormone (GH) responses during the clonidine stimulation test (CST) and glucagon stimulation test (GST) in children being evaluated for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), and identified optimal sampling time points that may allow protocol simplification without compromising diagnostic agreement. Methods This prospective study included 55 children who were subjected to CST and GST at a one-week interval. Blood samples for GH were taken at different time intervals following each provocative test per standard protocols. GH levels were estimated by the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method. A peak GH level of less than 8 ng/mL was considered diagnostic of GHD. Results Among 55 children, 41 were diagnosed with GHD and 14 with idiopathic short stature (ISS). Overall, peak GH levels were noted at 0, 60, and 90 minutes after CST and 0, 120, and 180 minutes after GST in more than 98% of the study cohort. The sensitivity of CST and GST in diagnosing GHD was 87.8% and 90.2%, and the specificity was 85.5% and 100%, respectively. The combined provocative tests (CST and GST) had an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.000, outperforming the individual tests, which had an AUC of 0.914 for CST and 0.987 for GST, to diagnose GHD and ISS. Conclusions CST and GST show high concordance in the evaluation of GHD using modern ECLIA-based assays, with GST demonstrating relatively higher specificity. Optimization of sampling time points permits protocol simplification without compromising diagnostic agreement, improving clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.