Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589144›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Scoring Methods to Assess Resectability in Ovarian Carcinoma.

Joju Antony Sebastian, Santhoshkumar Bandegudda, Kalla B Muralidhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joju Antony SebastianDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, IND.
Santhoshkumar BandeguddaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Prakriya Hospitals, Bengaluru, IND.
Kalla B MuralidharDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Laparoscopy, Mahatma Gandhi Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Visakhapatnam, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Comparison of peritoneal carcinomatosis scoring methods in carcinoma of the ovary and evaluation of their prediction of complete cytoreduction in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods This prospective observational study included 100 patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated at a tertiary cancer center from July 2020 to October 2021. Preoperative assessment involved USG and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to calculate the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI). Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed to record the Fagotti score. Intraoperatively, surgical PCI was determined, followed by cytoreductive surgery. Correlation between imaging-derived and surgical PCI scores was analyzed using Spearman's correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify PCI cutoff values predictive of complete cytoreduction. Results The mean surgical PCI was 8.05, while the mean CT-PCI and USG-PCI were 5.63 and 4.21, respectively. CT-PCI showed a stronger correlation with surgical PCI (ρ = 0.867) than USG-PCI (ρ = 0.750), both statistically significant (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (73%) had a Fagotti score of 0, and none scored ≥8. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 98% of cases. A surgical PCI cutoff of 14.5 predicted complete cytoreduction with 84.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CT demonstrated higher accuracy than USG in detecting disease across abdominal regions, especially outside the pelvis; both were limited in identifying small bowel involvement. Conclusions CT-based PCI is the most reliable noninvasive modality for preoperative assessment of peritoneal disease burden. In select post-neoadjuvant patients with favorable imaging, laparoscopy may be omitted, optimizing surgical planning and outcomes.

Indexed as

carcinoma ovarycytoreductive surgeryepithelial ovarian cancerfagotti scoreperitoneal carcinomatosis index (pci)resectability assessment

Identifiers

PMID41589144
PMCPMC12831649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.