ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2025
Application of data science methods, including machine learning, in the classification of focal lesions in the thyroid gland.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to train, evaluate, and optimize machine learning models for classifying focal lesions in the thyroid gland as benign or malignant based on their features. Material and methods: A dataset of 841 focal thyroid lesions described by 17 features (ultrasonographic and patient characteristics) was considered. Using the Python programming language, statistical and then exploratory data analyses were conducted using the libraries, including the generation of graphs and heat maps of correlations between the considered features. Binary classification models were selected to categorize the focal lesion on the basis of their characteristics into one of two classes (benign lesion, malignant lesion). The following models were used: logistic regression-based, support vector machine-based, k-nearest neighbor model, Random Forest model, and decision tree classifier. We applied formulas to select those focal lesion features that most contributed to the models' classification decisions. The final dataset consisted of 841 focal thyroid lesions described by seven ultrasonographic features and histopathological assessment of malignancy (benign or malignant). Classifiers were validated using 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, accuracy, measure-F, precision, area under the ROC curve, PPV, NPV, specificity. Results: The best-performing model (in term of sensitivity) was the classifier based on a support vector machine: sensitivity = 71.17%, accuracy = 83.24%, area under the ROC curve = 84.86%, measure f1 = 69.13%, precision = 68.85%, PPV = 68.49%, NPV = 89.06%. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the usefulness of data science methods in predicting the malignant nature of focal lesions in the thyroid gland. It proves that classification decisions made by the studied models are based on specific ultrasonographic features associated with increased or reduced risk of malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.