ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Protocol for DESCIDE-RD: Determining Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making in Drug Therapy Selection for Rheumatic Diseases.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The availability of biologic agents and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors has expanded therapeutic options for rheumatic diseases, and international guidelines now recommend shared decision-making (SDM) to guide treatment selection. This study will evaluate whether a structured SDM model enhances patients' perceptions of SDM when selecting biologic agents or JAK inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), compared to standard care. This open-label, multicentre, stratified cluster-randomised trial will enrol 300 patients with RA or AS. Participants will be assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: SDM Group I, SDM Group II, or standard care. In the SDM groups, the Three-Talk Model (Team Talk, Option Talk, and Decision Talk) will be implemented. SDM Group I will receive decision aids during Option Talk, while SDM Group II will receive both decision aids and an artificial intelligence-based chatbot. In the standard care group, treatment recommendations will be made at the physician's discretion. The primary outcome will be the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire score. Secondary outcomes will include changes in the Decisional Conflict Scale, the Health Empowerment Scale, the Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the EuroQol-5 Dimension. Data will be collected using iCReaT (http://icreat.kr). This study will provide evidence on the effectiveness of structured SDM in selecting biologic agents and JAK inhibitors for RA and AS, with potential implications for improving treatment decisions and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.