ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Liver Transplant Anesthesia Practice Patterns in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand: Results From a Multi-National Survey.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liver Transplant Anesthesia Practice Patterns in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand: Results From a Multi-National Survey.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiver transplantation is the only curative treatment for end-stage liver disease, yet perioperative management is complex and high-risk. Variations in anesthetic practices may influence outcomes, but benchmarks are scant. This study characterizes liver transplant anesthesia practices in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand to identify patterns and opportunities to establish a "standard of care."
methodsAn online questionnaire, adapted from the 2021 Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia survey, was distributed to the directors of liver transplant anesthesia at 18 adult and pediatric programs. The survey covered team structure, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management. Responses were stratified by annual transplant volume and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).
resultsDedicated transplant anesthesia teams existed in 76% of centers, with 31% offering transplant fellowships. Standardized preoperative cardiac evaluation was reported by 82%, though only 31% used formal risk-stratification tools. More than half-59%-used transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery catheters intraoperatively. Renal replacement therapy was applied in 76%, and viscoelastic testing in 82% of centers. Graft flushing on the back-table and in the surgical field occurred in 60% and 69% of programs, respectively; retrograde blood perfusion was used by 50%. Extubation at case-end was rare, while up to 25% of patients were extubated within 2-4 h. Postoperative intensive care unit admission was nearly universal.
conclusionsThese findings identified substantial practice variability, highlighting opportunities to develop consensus guidelines and targeted training to standardize perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.