ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Efficacy and Safety of Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Regimens in Locally Advanced Squamous Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Regimens in Locally Advanced Squamous Head and Neck Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), which constitutes approximately 90% of all head and neck cancers, represents a significant global health burden. A concerning trend is the rising incidence, particularly among younger populations, which has been partly attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. While treatment outcomes are favorable for early-stage disease, approximately 60% of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced HNSCC (LA-HNSCC), for whom prognosis remains suboptimal. Induction chemotherapy, such as the TPF regimen, is often used to reduce tumor burden but is limited by substantial toxicity. Currently, no global consensus exists on the optimal neoadjuvant approach for LA-HNSCC. This network meta-analysis aims to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of available neoadjuvant therapies for LA-HNSCC, excluding nasopharyngeal carcinoma due to distinct treatment paradigms, in order to inform clinical decision-making.
aimTo compare the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant treatment options in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). METHODS AND
resultsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search across four major databases (PubMed, Web of Science [WOS], Embase, and Cochrane Library) from their inception through August 2024. The primary outcome measures included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and serious adverse events (SAEs). This analysis included 23 studies (19 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 4 non-randomized studies [NRS]) involving 4052 patients. Network meta-analysis (NMA) revealed the following findings: Regarding efficacy, hyperthermia + chemotherapy demonstrated superior outcomes in both ORR and OS, followed by immunotherapy + chemotherapy. Hyperthermia + chemotherapy showed significantly better ORR compared to targeted therapy + chemotherapy, TP, PF, T, and single-agent immunotherapy (p < 0.05). Similarly, immunotherapy + chemotherapy outperformed all other therapies except hyperthermia + chemotherapy in ORR (p < 0.05). For OS, both hyperthermia + chemotherapy and TPF were significantly more effective than PF and TP (p < 0.05). In PFS, immunotherapy + chemotherapy showed the best results, followed by targeted therapy + chemotherapy, with immunotherapy + chemotherapy being significantly superior to PF (p < 0.05). Regarding safety, hyperthermia + chemotherapy showed the poorest safety profile, followed by TPF. Specifically, T and TP demonstrated significantly better safety than hyperthermia + Chemotherapyy (p < 0.05).
conclusionIn the neoadjuvant treatment of LA-HNSCC, both hyperthermia + chemotherapy and immunotherapy + chemotherapy regimens have demonstrated promising therapeutic efficacy; however, their safety profiles require further comprehensive evaluation.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024571174.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.