Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588861›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Artificial Symbiosis for Bulk Production of Bacterial Cellulose Composites.

Kui Yu, Sing Teng Chua, Ran Zhao, Alyssa Smith, Michael Kühl, Alison G Smith, Tom Ellis, Silvia Vignolini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kui YuYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sing Teng ChuaYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ran ZhaoSustainable and Bio-inspired Materials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.
Alyssa SmithYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michael KühlMarine Biology Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark.
Alison G SmithDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tom EllisImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, London, United Kingdom.
Silvia VignoliniYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0664-1418

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011194/1EPSRC Underpinning Multi-User Equipment Call EP/P030467/1ERC BiTe ERC-2020 CoS-101001637Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation GBMF9206Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF24OC0094451SNSF Sinergia 198750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiotic relationships between micro-organisms are key to the function of all global ecosystems. Here we extrapolate this concept for biomaterial fabrication by creating artificial symbiotic relationships between species that are usually not grown synergistically in nature. Specifically, we combine the cellulose-producing bacterium Komagataeibacter hansenii and the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to obtain bulk growth of bacterial cellulose. Usually, bacterial cellulose is produced as floating pellicles at the air-liquid interface of the growing media, because free oxygen, together with the nutrients in the culture medium, is required for the bacteria to synthesize the cellulose fibers. In the co-culture, bacterial cellulose production can be achieved in bulk beyond the spatial restriction of the air-liquid interface as the motile microalgae with photosynthetic activities act as oxygen-generating sites within the culture medium. In exchange, the highly porous and mechanically robust scaffold provided by the cellulose allows the algal-bacterial community to form a bio-composite up to several centimeters in thickness. We demonstrate that this symbiotic growth platform allows the simultaneous production of bulk bacterial cellulose in static incubation conditions, taking up an arbitrary and yet tunable 3D shape, dependent on the geometry of the culture vessel.

Indexed as

AcetobacteraceaeCelluloseSymbiosisChlamydomonas reinhardtiiCoculture TechniquesCellulosebacterial cellulosebacterial cellulose nanocrystalsbiofilmco‐cultureimmobilizationliving materialsmicroalgae

Identifiers

PMID41588861
PMCPMC12957870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.