Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588749›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation and research2026

Estimating the ideal pretransplant waiting time for living donor liver transplantation in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a retrospective study.

Nalini Kanta Ghosh, Kausar Makki, Piyush Srivastava, Anil Agarwal, Mukul Rastogi, Tathagata Karan, Yogesh Yadav, Vivek Vij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nalini Kanta GhoshDepartment of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-0235
Kausar MakkiDepartment of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7603-3744
Piyush SrivastavaDepartment of Liver Transplant Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0662-2228
Anil AgarwalDepartment of Liver Transplant Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-6285
Mukul RastogiDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-8541
Tathagata KaranDepartment of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0228-5707
Yogesh YadavDepartment of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5553-8616
Vivek VijDepartment of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9582-7964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with high mortality, but transplantation improves survival. Optimizing organ function is time-consuming and can increase infection risk. This study investigated the optimal pretransplant waiting period. Methods: In this retrospective study of patients with ACLF who underwent transplantation between January 2021 and August 2024, perioperative details and morbidity were compared between survival and mortality groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the cutoff for the pretransplant waiting period. Results: Among 112 patients with ACLF under the European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria, 61 (54.5%) underwent living donor liver transplantation (mean age, 41 years; 51 males [83.6%]). The most common etiology was viral infection (44.2%). The median Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF-C) score was 44 (respiratory failure, 14.7%; renal failure, 16.4%). There were 14 (22.9%) posttransplant deaths. The median waiting period between admission and surgery was longer in the mortality group (8 vs. 4 days, P=0.2). The area under the ROC curve for the optimal pretransplant waiting period was 0.723 (P=0.01). A cutoff of 5 days predicted mortality with 71.4% sensitivity and 61.9% specificity. On univariate analysis, survivors and nonsurvivors differed significantly in age, hemoglobin level, warm ischemia time, and postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding; on multivariate analysis, postoperative GI bleeding independently predicted mortality. During a median follow-up of 17 months, no deaths occurred. Conclusions: A pretransplant waiting period of 5 days predicted mortality; furthermore, postoperative GI bleeding was an independent predictor of mortality. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Acute-on-chronic liver failureLiver transplantationOutcomeWaiting time

Identifiers

PMID41588749
PMCPMC13019118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.